“Would you die for the homeland?”

The idea came from the legal thriller of the American Scott Tarrow, “The Laws of Our Fathers”, which at that time was still laurels from the bestseller “Innocent until proven otherwise”. His protagonist in the 60’s had avoided conscription and mission in Vietnam, he was treated almost like a deserter and at some point he was faced with the basic question: “Would you die for the homeland?”. The answer was surprising, not only because it was short, without evading, but because a whole discussion about the “useful man” began. Beneficial for his own, but also for the wider society in which he moves. “I would live for my homeland…” he had answered. daily sheet. It was immediately after October 28, 1999, a time of prosperity and optimism, with the country and the world preparing to enter the new millennium – and with the certainty that things can only get better. European monetary union was the new achievement, the Athens Olympics were four years ahead, but they had already created a vast construction site. “Earthquake diplomacy” had even changed the climate to Greek-Turkish – Imia, which just three years earlier had brought the two countries one step away from the war, was a distant memory. And the question found an audience, as well as many willing to answer – academics, artists, businessmen. So, does anyone live or die for the homeland? Yes, there is self-denial and self-sacrifice on the battlefield that can give a boost to the world, but few had a choice dilemma between, for example, Leonidas of “Molon Lave” and Georgios Papanikolaou of test pap. Who, after all, was most useful to his society and humanity? Almost everyone had come to the conclusion that Einstein should not be mentioned because he left on a front and became a model of heroism, as almost everyone had referred to the adage “In war my soldier if you go to die, then you lose the war”, which he was obviously judged to answer the original question indirectly. Some referred to Virgil (“If you want peace, prepare for war”), seeking a balance, while General Patton had found a place in the answers – “The purpose of war is not to die for your country, but to do the other It is obvious, however, that the question is misleading and the reaction it provokes has to do with its time. There is no one-size-fits-all answer. And surely not everyone will face it from the same angle, when the “Oruts Rey” cuts for days walks 12 miles from Rhodes. In order for an Einstein to exist, there must also be a Leonidas on a battlefield. In essence, they complement each other in a historical path and may be just as crucial to the evolution of humanity. Whether the soldiers go forward with a smile, however, is another matter… Follow it on Google News and be the first to know all the news See all the latest News from Greece and the World, at

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *