The Luddites of public education

Teachers – more precisely, their union representatives – are reacting to the introduction of electronic voting for the election of service councils every two years. This time they do not denounce “techno-fascism”, as some of their colleagues had done before, they find different, but equally comical reasons to invoke. I heard, for example, a trade unionist (of DAKE, I think…) exposing on the radio what frightens them with electronic voting. If they vote from home, the good man explained, they run the risk of the school principal coming to the voter’s home (in person, of course) to influence him! It sounds funny, but if you think about it, he is right, if he speaks from on the part of the school principal. Because, by voting through the physical presence of the voter, the director of the example or anyone else who intends to influence the voting is facilitated: he sets it up in the polling station, ie the school, and exerts his influence on the voters as they come. Conversely, if everyone is voting from their home via their computer, then indeed the one who wants to influence the vote is in a difficult position: he will have to run from one house to another, find where to park the car, be charged Also with the cost of gasoline – in short, trouble. (If predicted, would they have a different attitude? Probably…). Also, reference is made to teachers who do not have the technical means (!) To participate in electronic voting. We do not laugh here, we giggle. Is it possible today, when every student has his own laptop, to have teachers and professors without a computer? If they do exist, then they teach badly in schools, these people have nothing to do with modern education. because it establishes electronic voting as the only method of holding elections, but mainly because the election date ceases to be a working day and time, as it has been for almost forty years (it was the first Wednesday of November every second year) , will take place on a non-working day (the first Saturday of the same month). They lose their Saturday, that is, while until now it was the parents and the students who were in charge of the cost of the union. I mean, is it such a sacrifice to dedicate one Saturday every two years? Then what about the heroic rhetoric of the trade unionists about struggles, etc.? Are the holidays being stopped? But there is a more serious reason why they are reacting: electronic voting risks losing control of the service councils from those who have been in office for decades. It is characteristic that there are trade unionists, who spent their entire career in the service councils, without setting foot in order. But are the positions on the service councils so important that such noise is caused? This is because these boards control the changes of teachers (transfers, transfers, etc.), hence the misery of their control. This control is now in danger of being lost by electronic voting, which extends the vote to 170,000 teachers. Formally, of course, they always had the right to vote; in practice, however, only 40,000 went to the polls. Now, with the convenience of electronic voting, the remaining 130,000 can exercise their right from the peace of their home and, obviously, this frightens the trade unionists. It does not matter, they will get used to the weather… Follow it on Google News and be the first to know all the news See all the latest News from Greece and the World, at

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *