Research: How Trump uses Twitter for distraction



The theory that US President Donald Trump is using social media to divert public and media attention to important issues seems to be confirmed by a statistical analysis of thousands of presidential tweets. The unusual international study, published in Nature Communications, finds that Trump has indeed managed to limit his coverage of issues that put him in a difficult position thanks to his infamous posts. “Our analysis provides empirical evidence that is consistent with the theory that whenever the media reported on threatening or politically inconvenient issues, “President Trump, his Twitter account is increasing the posts on irrelevant issues that highlight his strong political points,” said Stefan Lewandowski, a professor of Cognitive Psychology at the University of Bristol and head of the international team. potentially hit him it was found to reduce significantly “In other words, the eccentric billionaire often manages to send the ball to the podium and manipulate public debate by directing it to issues that highlight his political power. For the first time in the history of politics.” , social media enables leaders and politicians in general to address their constituents directly, bypassing the media that has dominated in the past. Probably no other politician has used this opportunity as much as the outgoing president. Since the start of his campaign in 2005, some 30,000 tweets have appeared on Trump’s Twitter account, although it is not known which ones were written by him and which ones were not. Many suspected that the post-storm was aimed at disorienting public opinion, but to this day it remains an unconfirmed case. Keywords Russia. The researchers analyzed content related to Russia and Müller’s research in “two of the most neutral US media outlets”, the New York Times and the ABC World News Tonight. are likely to appear in distraction tweets. Such keywords or phrases were, for example, “jobs”, “immigration”, and “China”, topics that correspond to the supposed strengths of Trump’s policy. Researchers looked at two hypotheses: there is more negative coverage in the media. And secondly, the disorienting posts successfully manage to reduce the negative coverage the next day. The analysis showed that both hypotheses are correct. The more reports on Mueller’s research appeared in the New York Times and ABC, the more often Trump referred to China, job retention, and immigration policy. This in turn led to a reduction in reports on Müller’s search a day later. Conversely, for every two keyword appearances in the presidential post, there was one article less about Mueller research in the NY Times the next day. The researchers say they used statistical methods to rule out other factors that might influence the outcome of the study. For example, the correlation found between the posts and the news coverage did not apply to neutral keywords, such as Brexit, gardening or baseball. “It remains unclear whether President Trump, or anyone else, has the reins of the account. on Twitter, deliberately or intuitively engages in this tactic, “said Professor Lewandowski.” In any case, we hope that our findings provide a useful reminder to the media that they have the power to set the agenda, to focus on the issues they consider more importantly, and may not pay as much attention to the realm of Twitter. ”Follow it on Google News and be the first to know all the news See all the latest News from Greece and the World



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *