Pyrrhic victory Technologybud

Most of us have a laid back attitude when it comes to painting a picture about ourselves. Pyrrhus, the king of Epirus, won at Ashkelon in 279 BC. the battle with the Romans, but he lost so many soldiers and officers that he was forced not only to halt his march to Rome, but also to declare – according to Plutarch – that another victory over the Romans would amount to his total destruction. . Since then, “Pyrrhic victory” has been synonymous with high cost – so high that it makes you think twice about whether and to what extent it is in your best interest to win or lose. Like, good time, you wonder about the victory of Joe Biden. I guess, when you read these lines, Biden’s dominance over Trump will be locked; the time I write them is considered extremely probable, based on the number of voters who has secured, 17 breaths away from the magic 270, while Trump’s path to the presidency is much narrower, but – mathematically, at least – not a complete impasse. I also assume that Donald Trump – the most unpredictable president in the history of the United States – has limited himself to the first jokes to be seen (for the “price of arms”, as the ancients used to say) and will not launch a process that will probably try irreparably, the democratic institutions of the superpower and will shed new conspiracy light on his foresight to appoint a republican majority of judges to the Supreme Court. “The bones of the Fathers of the Nation will be creaking,” said a top Washington correspondent as soon as he heard his vulgar and unsubstantiated allegations of election fraud. Let us hope that the Fathers of the Nation will not be forced by the developments to stop the creaking and to rise from the graves themselves. In any case, whether we are heading for lower political tones or a second American civil war, international commentators assume that well is already infected. Anyone who has had the “certainty” that Trump’s term will be remembered as a turbulent, flattering and unsightly parenthesis already feels the breath of the one who urges us, if we are looking for a parenthesis, to orient ourselves towards Biden’s term, no. not only because the incoming president will almost certainly be in office – for biological, primarily, reasons – but also because his term will rather capture the dying throat of a society and a disappearing mentality. Many years ago, in 1952, when humanity was healing its wounds from the bloodiest world war, it was on the brink of nuclear disaster and, nevertheless, remained as politically disgusted as a nun Ursulina, a voter approached Adenov Democrat for the presidency, an opponent of Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower, and – apparently to flatter him – told him: “All thinking people will vote for you.” Stevenson answered melancholy: “Unfortunately, ma’am, they are not enough; I need the majority.” Half a century later, Donald Trump shared Andlay Stevenson’s vitriolic view of the “brainless majority” but not the overwhelming majority. Where Stevenson saw “lost votes”, Trump saw “clients”. In 2004 he sat down and wrote a “breakout” of self-improvement – a quick book, as the Anglo-Saxons call it more elegantly: “How to get rich”. To be honest, I do not think Trump has written anything in his entire life other than misspelled comments on Twitter with usually hilarious results – such as confusing polls with Poles – and he certainly did not write this book. He dictated it in his famous delusional way to Meredith McAiver, a staff writer of the Trump Group, who twelve years later, during her boss’s first presidential campaign, will win her own with her sword ” Fifteen Minutes “of negative publicity: he was accused of implanting an excerpt from a speech by Michelle Obama in a speech by Melania Trump as a logger. She admitted her gossip – how to do it anyway? – and submitted her resignation to Trump, which was not accepted (alas: I guess for Trump plagiarism is a skill) .Anyway. Somewhere in my library grazes the Greek version of “How to become rich” (released the same year by Attica Publications) and, while my memory still helps me, I remember leafing through it with deep yawns. It is full of expected clich├ęs in order to get into the tally without effort or appeal, but it omits the two most important conditions, those that helped him: to have a rich dad and to steal from the Tax Office. However, among the boring tips, it shines like a rough diamond and one, which he used extensively in the following years, until he moved from the Trump Tower to the White House: “Make your name a logo and advertise yourself.” In this case, you are calling him a prophet. Old-fashioned ethicists like the late Andlay Stevenson (by definition unfit for the political arena, if we do not want to go blind) would hardly award the title of “charismatic” to a populist leader. By their own standards, the old-fashioned, “charismatic” may be a brilliant scientist or a gifted artist – but what exactly do we recognize as “charismatic” in a political swindler? His ability to lie without sweating or his comfort to turn to orthodoxy and flatter the lowest possible spiritual denominator, tend to listen and reward our sexism, our racism, our phobias, our stupidity, our Our prejudices and obsessions? It goes without saying that Donald Trump did not discover populism, but cultivated it and upgraded it to new levels of collective deprivation and deprivation. He leaves us a legacy of rewarding idiots and shaking democratic institutions. But this – as the grumpy Andlay would murmur – is not a legacy to be proud of. It is a legacy (as long as you can not deny it) to silence its acceptance ashamed. Follow it on Google News and be the first to know all the news See all the latest news from Greece and the world, at

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *