How can we “save time” and now the NSS is again “on the verge”?

Last spring we agreed that there should be a padlock in the country, that there should be a downturn in economic activity, that jobs should be jeopardized, that we should live an experience of collective exclusion, that we should see our freedoms sacrificed, because we were told that this could save time. That is, what the government said was not ready yet. That is, what the government said was: be patient, accept the restrictions now because they limit the spread and ensure that there is always an ICU available, so that we can take advantage of this time, organize more ICUs. , to open more simple COVID-19 beds, to configure primary health care structures, etc., so that when the second wave comes (which we all knew from the beginning would exist) the health system can withstand more cases and if possible avoid analogous loukdoun or go to measures that will be restrictive but will not fully bring the economy and society to their knees. and now it is as if we have returned to the same point again. The government announces that the health system is on the verge of collapse, that we risk not having available ICUs, that occupancy is increasing in even the simplest COVID beds, and that we need to practically go to a new lockout long enough to withstand the second wave. I know that whenever the government is under pressure, it is quick to say that it has increased ICU beds since last year. I do not disagree, but the fact that we went from a very low number to a low number can not be considered an achievement. That is, as one can see that at the moment the ministry announces that we have 312 available ICU-COVID beds of which 188 are occupied and 124 vacancies (40%) only as proof that “we saved time” does not look like. Nor is it just a solution to get ICUs that should be available for other cases, to make them ICU-COVID, as permanent cancellation is not a solution And it is not enough to “do what we can”. To put it another way, if one realizes the political and social costs of returning to extreme restrictive measures, because of the risk of reaching the limit of the health system, if nothing else one realizes that it would be much preferable to invest even more in the public health system in time. An investment that will remain for us even after the pandemic. Citizens do not expect any government to do so. aumata. And restrictive measures are willing to tolerate, as they have patiently supported in the past. But they are also waiting for the government to abide by its part of the agreement and show that it has indeed used the time gained. And so far this has not been done. on Google News and be the first to know all the newsSee all the latest News from Greece and the World, at

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *