An unjustly guilty word Technologybud



It was an incident that in the terminology of the past we would call “moral order”. Specifically, the parliamentary representative of the KKE, Nikos Karathanassopoulos, an MP from Achaia, provoked by the so-called MPs of the “Greek Solution”, uttered the terrible phrase “politics and nonsense has its limits”. (He probably meant it as a wish, I imagine, as we all know from history that this thing knows no bounds…) The phrase, of course, shocked the institutional modesty of Parliament, as in fact the KKE MP uttered it calmly and coolly, not screaming in a nervous breakdown. The chairman at that time asked the MP to feel (sic) the space in which he is and to recall. But he insisted: “I do not recall anything. “Politics and nonsense have their limits.” It is well known to the readers of the column that I have no appreciation for the KKE, the politics it advocates and its history. Nor do I necessarily agree with the opinion expressed in this way by the KKE MP. However, I defend his right to use this way, that is, the misunderstood word “m @ l @ kia”, regardless of whether I agree or disagree with the way he uses it. First of all, let us publicly acknowledge what each of us recognizes individually that this word covers an expressive need. In fact, an expressive need is very pressing – otherwise, we would not use it so often in our daily lives. (By the way, I remember very well twenty years ago a travel agency ad in a British newspaper, where Greece was presented approximately as “the land of souvlaki and malaka”…). It is worth noting, after all, that in his controversial phrase the KKE MP speaks of “m @ l @ kia” and nonsense, that is, he refers to two different things. However, if “m @ l @ kia” as a word needs moral restoration and acquittal in public discourse, is for its historicity, which has been unjustly ignored. This is due to the distance that separates us today from the texts of the ancient Greek literature. We only know the reference to the word in the Epitaph of Pericles (“we philosophize without bullshit”: a source of endless plaque in the high school years…) and we think that this is so far. Wrong! Because if we read in the original historical, political and rhetorical texts of antiquity, we will find – let me play the pun – that “shit” goes cloud. In order not to be misunderstood, let me clarify here that, when I use the term “m @ l @ kia”, I am referring to the prevailing use of the word, the one that is considered offensive and vulgar according to the prevailing morals, while with the term “bullshit” I refer to I do not pretend to be an expert, I speak as nothing more than a thinking reader and I find that, for example, in the language of Plutarch, which is not difficult for anyone who has spent six years in high school with one hour Ancient every day, “bullshit” means first of all softness, lack of ambition, weak mind. Consequently, and especially in the context of political life, “bullshit” means incompetence, oligarchy and, ultimately, inadequacy. I want to say with all this that the use of the word then and now is no different. On the contrary, there is a continuum here and you feel it the more you immerse yourself in the environment of language: the “shit” of the ancients is the “m @ l @ kia” of their descendants! The “soft”, as they said, is not much different from our familiar “m @ lak @”. I understand the comically tragic nature of the confession, but, reading Plutarch’s Lives this summer, my emotion was genuine and deep, when I felt the linguistic continuity as something alive and real, thanks to this unjustly despised and guilty word. That is why I understand Karathanassopoulos and I defend the use of the word. Follow it on Google News and be the first to know all the news. See all the latest news from Greece and the world, at



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *