A “jihad” policy Technologybud



The attempt of Recep Tayyip Erdogan to appear as a key representative of the Muslim world and to lead a “jihad” policy primarily towards the West, is not surprising. Neither Athens, nor Brussels, nor Washington. A similar attempt was made during Ankara’s conflict with Riyadh, on the occasion of the dismemberment of journalist Jamal Kasigi at the Arab consulate in Istanbul. Erdogan had then ruled that he had the opportunity to break out against “American slavery” Saudi Arabia, while opening even bigger channels with Qatar. Earlier, as a supporter of the rights of Palestinians and an independent Palestinian, he had set the stage for a war with Israel by supporting Turkish activists off the coast of Gaza. He again resorted to a war of religions, in the name of the “oppressed” Muslims by the imperialists. The same task is being waged today, now turning its fire against Europe and reaching as far as the Crusades to reach Muslims everywhere. For Erdogan, as incomprehensible as it may seem to Westerners, “the spark of freedom that has spread from the Balkans to southern Asia came out of the East. ” The project will obviously continue. The question is what is the ultimate goal behind this tactic. The long-time leader who has now “escaped” could be an explanation, but he does not explain the adaptation to this planning of almost the entire Turkish political scene. Inside, the “sultan” has no rival – even the mayor of Istanbul has retreated in the face of the Turkish president’s bigotry. So what is the next step? For those who have been following developments across the Aegean for a long time, there is no doubt that Erdogan, behind the attacks and threats, primarily in Europe, is looking for a new treaty. The Treaty of Lausanne (1923) set the boundaries of modern Turkey, but the one that still hurts the Turkish political class, and consequently a leading Turkish society, is the Treaty of Sevres (1920). It put an end to the former Ottoman Empire, which was dismembered by paying the price for its role in World War I. The last sultan, Mehmet VI, handed over sovereignty over the region from Mesopotamia (Iraq) to Palestine, Jordan and Armenia. By the same token, the Kurdistan region acquired a state entity, while Syria and Lebanon passed into French sphere of influence. The Aegean was changing into a Greek sea at the same time and the area of ​​Smyrna could be annexed to Greece five years later by a local referendum. What was signed in 1920 in the Paris suburbs reaped the Neo-Turkish movement that, under the leadership of Kemal Mustafa, took over shortly after the reins of a shrinking empire on the borders of present-day Turkey. It is not an unpredictable development that with the Ankara-Tripoli memorandum, Erdogan considers that a plan to overthrow the Treaty of Sevres has been implemented. He also tried to “sell” to the internal audience by invading the northern border of Syria, while he has similar aspirations with almost all the offensive moves of recent years with the military presence from Nagorno-Karabakh to Libya. With a warlike face that mutating into a peaceful and instrumentalist refugee, Erdogan is not constantly seeking more money and concessions from Europe. In fact, he wants a new map for Turkey – with his signature. Then, as a leader who writes history and surpassed Kemal, he can claim a role of “ethnarch” for Muslims as well. Europe is beginning to realize it. Follow it on Google News and be the first to know all the news See all the latest News from Greece and the World, at



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *